Fuck John Bolton.
--
User feedback for article:
Title: Bolton shifts Clinton critique
Link: <http://politi.co/VUqU6s>
Feedback submitted via POLITICO for iPad version: 2.3.1 r1651, device: iPad (iPad2,5), iOS version: 6.0.2.
Sent from my iPad
Many words for rain. Seattle. Mike Baker. Writer of wrongs. My opinion, only, like a giant tweet.
Fuck John Bolton.
--
User feedback for article:
Title: Bolton shifts Clinton critique
Link: <http://politi.co/VUqU6s>
Feedback submitted via POLITICO for iPad version: 2.3.1 r1651, device: iPad (iPad2,5), iOS version: 6.0.2.
"I’m not here to run against Mike McGinn or any particular candidate; I’m running because there are too many internal pissing matches in politics in Seattle," Murray said. "I think that our styles are very different. That’s one of the reasons I’m running." - Publicola, Ed Murray's Running for Mayor
Another hurdle for Steinbrueck is being branded with the "L" word—not a lesbian, but a lobbyist. He contends that his lobbying positions are consistent with his personal convictions. "I do some lobbying, but it's a tiny part of what I do," he explains. Steinbrueck has done work recently on behalf of the Port of Seattle to oppose the arena in Sodo.
In addition, Steinbrueck has recently taken work with the Washington State Department of Transportation (as a historic architect for settlement issues along the deep-bore tunnel alignment), the Pike Place Market Preservation & Development Authority (for waterfront design), a University District group (advocating that the future light rail station have a park atop of it instead of a building), and Virginia Mason Medical Center (helping with its land-use planning). And finally, he's working on behalf of the South Lake Union Community Coalition, which is lobbying the city to restrict a proposal for 400-foot towers in South Lake Union.
The Seattle Times editorial page applauded the move as a necessary check against the Democratic House and governor [“State coalition caucus a promising change,” Opinion, Dec. 12]. This argument looks flimsy after Washington voters overwhelmingly selected Democrats for president, senator, a majority of our congressional delegation, governor, all statewide offices except one, and majorities in the state House and Senate.
The fact is, though, the public expects us to work together to move the state forward, no matter who is in charge. This is especially true in the Senate, a diverse body with an unstable balancing point that shifts from issue to issue. After the election, majority Democrats knew that the Senate would descend into dysfunction if we tried to govern with a strict 25-vote strategy, the bare minimum number of votes necessary. We knew we needed to work from a much broader base, 30 to 35 votes. So we proposed a more-inclusive, less-partisan organizing model than has ever existed before, including a bipartisan education finance committee, and invited dialogue with Republicans about our proposal.
. . .
A strict 25-senator majority changing longstanding Senate rules to consolidate their hold on power will surely invite mischief and abuse in the future, and create unintended negative consequences for the public.
You could call that many things. Just don’t call it bipartisan.
Two conservative Democratic state senators announced today they will join with Senate Republicans to form a “majority coalition caucus” in which they say power will more or less be split between the two parties.
The coup, which has been rumored since Republicans gained a seat in the Senate in last month’s election, would install one of the conservative Democrats, former Republican Rodney Tom of Bellevue, as the body’s majority leader and the other, Tim Sheldon of Potlach, as the president pro tempore.
In an interview earlier this week, Murray said he plans to reach out during the next few months to neighborhood groups, as well as business and civic leaders to gauge support. "Do I think a good number of people will come and help and support, yes, but, man, I cannot take it for granted," Murray said. "Burgess is a solid council member. McGinn is the last person I would write off. This is the guy who defeated an incumbent mayor. I have some work to do before I can have a full campaign for mayor."
It's not like Murray would be starting from scratch or suffers from a lack of name recognition, given the high-profile issues he's been in the middle of, including transportation and gay marriage.
DeMint's positions have earned him rankings as one of the most conservative senators. He supported partially privatizing Social Security and installing a flat sales tax to replace income taxes. He once suggested that gays and unwed pregnant women should not teach in public schools.http://seattletimes.com/html/nationworld/2019844731_apusdemintresigns.html
“I like Tim,” Council Member Tom Rasmussen told The Stranger earlier this year. “He does his homework… He would make a good mayor.”
Someone using POLITICO for iPhone wants to share this article with you:
By JUANA SUMMERS | 11/25/2012 10:34 AM EST
Reporters are partially to blame for the dismal job approval ratings of Congress, Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) says, attributing some of the gridlock and hyper-partisanship on the Hill to the 24-hour news cycle. 'For one thing, the media now have a lot of time …
Download the POLITICO app for your iPhone, iPad, or Android device
Follow POLITICO on Twitter: @POLITICO
Disclaimer: Please note that POLITICO is not responsible for the content within this email. POLITICO cannot verify the sender of this email.
Republicans say eliminating filibusters - even on a piecemeal basis - will undermine the fundamental underpinnings of the Senate as a body designed to operate on consensus and protect the minority party, making the body run like the House, where the majority rules with an iron fist.
Someone using POLITICO for iPhone wants to share this article with you:
By MANU RAJU | 11/25/2012 01:02 PM EST
A partisan war is brewing that could bring the government to a screeching halt as early as January - and no, it's not over the fiscal cliff. It's all about the filibuster. Democrats are threatening to change filibuster rules, in what will surely prompt a f…
Download the POLITICO app for your iPhone, iPad, or Android device
Follow POLITICO on Twitter: @POLITICO
Disclaimer: Please note that POLITICO is not responsible for the content within this email. POLITICO cannot verify the sender of this email.
Among the possible candidates are: state Sen. Ed Murray; three current or former City Council members, Tim Burgess, Bruce Harrell and Peter Steinbrueck; former County Executive Ron Sims; commercial real-estate broker Charlie Staadecker; business owner and engineering project manager Albert Shen; Republican Port Commissioner Bill Bryant; and perhaps the most experienced of all, the former mayor of both Bellevue and Bremerton, Cary Bozeman.
Sales of bumper stickers reading "Secede" — one for $2, or three for $5 — have increased atTexasSecede.com. In East Texas, a Republican official sent an email newsletter saying it was time for Texas and Vermont to each "go her own way in peace" and sign a free-trade agreement among the states.
http://seattletimes.com/html/nationworld/2019752225_texascede24.html
Well, yes, it would be peaceful, but, no free trade agreement for you, not right away. You have to earn that kind of relationship. In the meantime, good luck fending off the Mexican drug cartels.
Have a great day,Mike Baker
Sent from my iPhoneVisit me here:
About Nick Licata. It's as if he had not read the MOU or attended any of the council meetings.
It doesn't matter if Chris Hansen over paid for property. The city will buy the property at a price determined by an independant estimate, and not whatever Hansen paid for it.
** Corrected from earlier e-mail with updated committee meeting information ** You have written in the past regarding the proposed sports arena. I am writing to provide you with an update. At its meeting earlier today, the Seattle City Council voted 6 to 2 to approve the three-party Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Seattle, King County, and ArenaCo, the investment group headed up by Chris Hansen. Because the Seattle City Council made changes to the MOU previously approved by the King County Council, the newly amended MOU must return to the King County Council for discussion and vote. The King County Council's Budget and Fiscal Management Committee anticipates taking up the MOU at a special meeting on Tuesday, October 2, beginning at 9:30 a.m. I was pleased to vote in support of the initial MOU when it was before the King County Council. I now look forward to reviewing the changes made by the Seattle City Council and am optimistic that the King County Council will vote to approve these changes. Again, thank you for contacting me. Please feel free to contact me in the future at (206) 296-1001 or bob.ferguson@kingcounty.gov. You can also find me on Facebook. Sincerely, Bob Bob Ferguson King County Councilmember Metropolitan King County Council, District 1 516 3rd Avenue, Room 1200 Seattle, WA 98104 ph: (206) 296-1001 | fx: (206) 296-0198 For more information: http://www.kingcounty.gov/ferguson Visit our website to view the latest District 1 eNews
First Right to Distributions.
Further, to satisfy any default in (A) ArenaCo’s obligations under the Arena Use Agreement and (B) the NBA Team’s obligations under the non-relocation agreement required by paragraph 21.d, the City and County will also be entitled to receive the first distributions of any proceeds from any sale of the NBA Team, subject only to repayment of any obligations of the NBA Team related to any debt of the NBA Team to the NBA or other lenders approved by the NBA that are secured by the NBA franchise and other assets of the NBA Team up to the $125 million cap plus the amount of Public Financing used to fund the SODO Transportation Infrastructure Fund in the Second Installment up to an additional $25 million on such debt currently allowed under applicable NBA rules (“NBA Team Secured Debt Obligations”). The total NBA Team Secured Debt Obligations shall not exceed $150 million. ArenaCo Parent shall covenant not to enter into any agreement that would interfere with City's and County's rights to receive distributions of the proceeds of sale of the NBA Team payable to City and County as and when provided for in this MOU, and the NBA Team shall covenant not to enter into any agreement granting any lien, security interest or other encumbrance on the NBA Team's assets in excess of the NBA Team Secured Obligations. The Parties also agree to explore further ways to secure the obligations of ArenaCo, ArenaCo Parent and the NBA Team subject to NBA requirements, rules, regulations and agreements. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, if the NBA revises its rules to allow NBA teams to borrow in excess of the current limit of $150 million that may be secured by the NBA franchise and other assets of NBA teams, then the NBA Team will be entitled to increase the amount of the NBA Team Secured Debt Obligations; provided, however, that the NBA Team will limit the amount of the NBA Team Secured Debt Obligations that will be senior to the right of the City and County to receive distributions of any proceeds from any sale of the NBA Team to the lesser of: (A) the maximum amount of NBA Team Secured Debt Obligations that is then allowed under NBA rules, or (B) 40% of the then "fair market value" ("FMV") of the NBA Team. The FMV of the NBA Team will be as mutually agreed upon in good faith by the Parties at that time; provided, however that if the Parties are unable to agree upon the FMV of the NBA Team at that time, then the FMV of the NBA Team will be determined by a sports industry recognized appraiser with experience in valuing NBA teams selected by the mutual agreement of the Parties pursuant to a customary valuation process to be specified in the Umbrella Agreement; but provided further, however, that if the NBA Team Secured Debt increase of the NBA Team is being sought in connection with the acquisition of the NBA Team on an arm’s-length basis by an unrelated party, then the FMV will be equal to the actual all-in acquisition price of the NBA
Team.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING SEATTLE SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT FACILITY
Burgess said after the news conference that he was skeptical of the deal when it was presented to the City Council in May, and grew more skeptical as he delved into it.
But eventually, he said, he realized "there's hidden opportunity here. Chris Hansen becomes the catalyst to do other things," like make transportation improvements in Sodo.
He said he's convinced there will be an arena built somewhere in the region soon, and it's better to get a direct benefit and be able to have some control over how it affects the Sodo neighborhood and KeyArena.
Asked whether there was anything the city wanted, but didn't get from Hansen, Burgess said, "Nothing. We got it all."
http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2019123410_arena12m.html
The commission is likely to seek a second, outside opinion on whether CEO Tay Yoshitani’s position on the board is a conflict of interest, said Commission Chairwoman Gael Tarleton.
What are the port leaders, and specifically Yoshitani, a smart and capable man, thinking? The seaport has just suffered the loss of a major portion of its container business, with the move of the Grand Alliance to Tacoma. In the dispute over the horrid conditions facing drayage truck drivers, a shameful example of the exploitation of "independent contractors," the port came off as insensitive and out of touch. Meanwhile, the Century Agenda, while a fine aspirational document, still lacks specifics about how the seaport will face growing competitive threats. Among them: the wider Panama Canal, Prince Rupert and Tacoma. Amid all this, the port chose a very public battle against the proposed Sonics arena, as if it's an "either/or" choice, rather than working constructively behind the scenes to ensure improved infrastructure and protection of industrial zoning. These challenges wouldn't seem to leave much "on his own time" time for Yoshitani to be moonlighting.http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/soundeconomywithjontalton/2019017245_what_is_the_port_of_seattle_th.html
It would be harsh to wonder if Yoshitani sees disarray and dysfunction at his employer and has decided to cash in while he can. But people are wondering just that. It's time for the port to remember, as it parses "conflicts of interest," that it serves the public interest.
From: wishxxxx@excite.com
To: Yoshitani.T@portseattle.org
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 10:06:00 -0700
Subject: Proposed SODO Arena
Tay
POS, I feel, is really starting to have a major PR problem with the proposed arena.
The numbers being thrown around regarding job creation just don't have any substance and are being viewed as "pie in the sky".
You've had freight mobility issues for years because of a constrained layout.
Losing a couple of major carriers hasn't added any weight to the job creation argument.
I feel that this is a ripe opportunity for the Port to gain substantial concessions from both the City and the County regarding dedicated transportation infrastructure.
Please see if you can get a better spin on what looks like a done deal.
Regards, MB.
Tell the Seattle City Council you support bringing the Sonics and NHL to Seattle!
Sally J. Clark, Council President
sally.clark@seattle.gov
@sallyjclark
206-684-8802
Sally Bagshaw
sally.bagshaw@seattle.gov
@sallybagshaw
206-684-8801
Tim Burgess
tim.burgess@seattle.gov
@CouncilmanTim
206-684-8806
Richard Conlin
richard.conlin@seattle.gov
@cmconlin
206-684-8805
City Council Group Message
council@seattle.gov
Jean Godden
jean.godden@seattle.gov
@SeattleScribe
206-684-8807
Bruce A. Harrell
bruce.harrell@seattle.gov
@bruceharrell
206-684-8804
Nick Licata
nick.licata@seattle.gov
@nicklicata
206-684-8803
Mike O'Brien
mike.obrien@seattle.gov
@CMMikeOBrien
206-684-8800
Tom Rasmussen
tom.rasmussen@seattle.gov
@CityhallTom
206-684-8808
Clearly state your support
Tell your elected officials why you support a new Sonics Arena and how excited you are for the return of the Sonics/arrival of the NHL.
Be polite
Let your passion be heard, but keep it clean.
Include Your Street Address
That way elected officials will know you live in the area, and County Council members will know you're in their district.
1. Building the Arena will require no new taxes.
2. Local business and community leaders have endorsed the Arena.
3. One of the largest private investments for any Arena in North America — public contribution to the Arena will be fully repaid by Arena generated revenues — unprecedented taxpayer protections in place.
4. Studies show there will be a minimal effect on traffic in the area.
5. The Arena will boost the local economy.
6. The NBA will return to Seattle — and this time it will stay.
[this email was sent from Bob Ferguson, King County Councilman]
I just went on the air with KJR sports talk radio's "Mitch in the Morning" and announced that I intend to vote "yes" to approve the MOU for the proposed new sports arena.
The King County Council is likely to vote this afternoon on the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the city of Seattle, King County, and the private investor group led by Chris
Hansen to develop a new arena.
I will propose several amendments, including a requirement for an independent economic impact analysis prior to spending any public funds, and an amendment to ensure that the rights to the Seattle Supersonics name, memorabilia, and history always remain with the City of Seattle. These amendments are supported by Chris Hansen.
I appreciate all the feedback I have received on this important issue. Over 3000 people wrote to me with their views, nearly 300 people attended a town hall meeting I held with Seattle City Councilmember Mike O'Brien, and an overflow crowd came to testify at the joint Seattle-King County Councils meeting.
Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts. I greatly value all the input given to me and my colleagues.
Please feel free to contact me in the future at (206) 296-1001or bob.ferguson@kingcounty.gov. You can also find me on Facebook.
Sincerely,
Bob
Bob Ferguson
King County Councilmember
Metropolitan King County Council, District 1
516 3rd Avenue, Room 1200
Seattle, WA 98104
ph: (206) 296-1001 | fx: (206) 296-0198
For more information: http://www.kingcounty.gov/ferguson
Visit our website to view the latest District 1 eNews
The reality of the situation is that a competing arena could get built outside of Seattle. Seattle would lose economically in a big way if that were to happen. There would be no interest and leverage by Seattle in resolving issues with Key Arena with a developer in Bellevue. Also, the substitution effect would have to local spending leave Seattle and go to Bellevue.
Support of WNBA Storm among Seattle arena issues Eds: Adds details, quotes. By TIM BOOTH AP Sports Writer SEATTLE (AP) — With the King County Council potentially taking a vote next Monday on a proposed new arena in Seattle, sticking points and possible concessions on traffic and the city's lease agreement with the Seattle Storm are building with the Seattle City Council. Seattle City Councilman Mike O'Brien told The Associated Press on Friday that city officials continue to negotiate with investor Chris Hansen over changes to a proposed deal between the city and the private ownership group. Among those issues are dealing with traffic concerns in the city's industrial SoDo neighborhood, and the possibility of having Hansen's ownership group take over the city's current annual subsidy of the Seattle Storm. The city's lease agreement with the Storm currently calls for a $300,000 payment each year from the city to the WNBA franchise as part of a revenue sharing agreement. Asked about talks on the Storm subsidy, O'Brien said: "I'm not exactly sure how that's going to fall out. That remains an issue." A spokesman for Hansen did not immediately return a message seeking comment. "Councilmembers have expressed to me that there are further concessions they are asking and if (Hansen) does not agree to those concessions we may lose this deal," said Brian Robinson, head of Arena Solution, a group supporting efforts to bring a new arena to the Seattle region. "My concern is the city will overreach in those concessions and they will lose this opportunity for the city of Seattle."Support of WNBA Storm among Seattle arena issues
How did that go again? Oh yes, Sally Clark said in an email to me, regarding the city council exempting the Storm lease:
On Jul 1, 2012, at 1:57 PM, "Clark, Sally"wrote: The Storm history is interesting. Staff remind me that we did that as a "belt and suspenders" approach; that we didn't technically need to exempt the Storm, but chose to just in case of an odd-ball challenge to the lease. The approval of the Storm lease, negotiated to include public benefit and to recognize the condition of Key, still strikes me as different from investing in the development of a new arena. I don't believe we've put the Seattle University or Stars on Ice or other Key Arena shows through an I-91 filter.
Yes the Storm's history is interesting.
Councilmember Clark, I knew better back in 2009. Do you still think it is fair for the council to characterize the Storm lease as I-91 compliant and exempting it as simply "belt and suspenders" to keep some oddball lawsuit?
I'm the "oddball" from 2009 that challenged Tom Rasmussen to not apply a double standard by favoring the Storm over the Sonics. Here we are two years later and you are actively favoring the Storm, and their subsidy, over the Sonics by burdening them with that Storm subsidy.
The hypocrisy is nauseating.
Will any of you councilmembers be able to say that there isn't a double standard between your approach to WBOS and the approach taken with Chris Hansen?
Doubtful.
For Key Arena, this is life and death, for Seattle, win or lose.
I love Seattle and I love liberals, but sometimes we are so politically correct that we ask the wrong questions. For instance: "What is more important, sports—or schools or libraries or health care for the poor or clean water or justice for all?" Of course sports is "less important," especially if you are asking the wrong question.
At that point we liberals get close to crossing the line from educated enlightenment to snobbery or elitism. We call for investment in the leisure- time priorities of the well-educated, but not always of working people.
As liberals, we pride ourselves in caring about people more than the right wing does. We should be a city that respects the desires and dreams of the child who falls asleep clutching a book, as well as the child who falls asleep clutching a basketball.
Friends,
First, thanks to the nearly 500 of you who turned out to last week's joint meeting of the County and City Councils to share your thoughts on the arena proposal with me and my colleagues.
I wanted to update you on recent action by the County Council and make you aware of a second opportunity for public testimony coming up next week.
After nine meetings of the Budget Committee, including presentations from staff analysts and our independent expert review panel, thousands of emails and in person testimony from hundreds of community members, I moved yesterday to advance the arena proposal from my committee to the full King County Council and we voted 8-0 to do so. This means that the King County Council could vote as early as this coming Monday, July 30th.
Monday's meeting will be yet another chance for the public to share their comments directly with councilmembers. The details for that meeting are below:
King County Council Meeting
Meeting begins 1:30pm(Estimated end time, 4:00pm)
Council Chambers, King County Courthouse
Your input has been and continues to be a vital part of this process and I hope to see you Monday!
-Joe
Joe McDermott
King County Councilmember, District 8
Subscribe to District 8's eNews