Showing posts with label Port of Seattle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Port of Seattle. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 2, 2016

Why did the Seattle Times sit on a story about robot longshoremen?

Turns out the Seattle Times sat on a story about robotic port operations in California that was published by Bloomberg before the arena vote.
In an email, the Seattle Times Peter Rosenberg told the Port of Seattle's Mike McGrath that they sat on the "Robot" story.


As I remarked on Sunday, May 15th:

An interesting thing about this story is that Bloomberg News wrote and posted the article on April 24th, a week before the arena vote. The Seattle Times didn't repeat it until 10-days later, after the May 2nd arena vote, on May 14th. 

When did the Seattle Times know about the Bloomberg story April 24th story?
Did the Seattle Times sit on the story to influence the Seattle City Council's May 2nd vote on the street vacation vote for the arena in SoDo by not showing the port eliminating jobs due to automation when moving container receiving from Terminal 46 to Terminal 5?

Just askin'


Have a great day,
Mike Baker
Seattle, Wa

Follow me here: @TweetMrBaker
Visit me there:
http://www.sonicsrising.com/authors/mike-baker

Sunday, May 15, 2016

How long will Seattle support a tradition of subsidizing Pollution and Longshoreman, what is California doing about it?

As consumers demand lower prices for goods, and less polluting ways to transport people or goods, look for those demands to join forces at ports worldwide. Currently, and not coincidentally, the Port of Seattle and the Northwest Port Alliance is working on plans to modernize Seattle's Terminal 5 to be "more efficient" and "less polluting."

TraPac LLC's Los Angeles marine-cargo facility demonstrates how autonomous technology could revolutionize freight transport as much as or more than personal travel. TraPac's equipment doubles the speed of loading and unloading ships, saving money and boosting profits. Their impact is rivaling that of containerization, which eliminated most manual sorting and warehousing on docks after World War II.

"Self-driving won't just rebuild the current freight system, it will create a whole new way of thinking about it,'' said Larry Burns, a former research and development chief at General Motors Co. and now a consultant at Alphabet Inc.'s Google unit.

"It will happen sooner with goods movements than with personal transportation, because the economics are crystal clear.''

Commercial shipments currently produce half the state's toxic diesel-soot emissions.

More automation also could help Governor Jerry Brown achieve his goal of zero-emission freight movement in California. Commercial shipments currently produce half the state's toxic diesel-soot emissions and 45 percent of the nitrogen oxide that plague Los Angeles with the nation's worst smog. In Long Beach, where most residents are Hispanic, black or Asian, an estimated 15 percent of the children have asthma, six percentage points higher than the national average, according to a community coalition report.

The state's Air Resources Board is scheduled to release a draft Sustainable Freight action plan on April 29. It will encompass new regulations on vehicles and fuels, as well as subsidies for new infrastructure, communications and operating procedures, according to ARB Chairman Mary Nichols.

Brown wants 100,000 zero-emission freight-hauling machines in California by 2030, according to recent ARB workshop presentations. These could include self-driving cranes and carriers like those at TraPac. Brown also could subsidize fuel-saving alternatives, such as semi-autonomous trucks, which were recently tested in Europe. If they're clean enough, he may give them preferential access to freeways and docks. He also may promote Uber-like services to find loads for empty or half-empty trucks and is considering a per-container cap on pollutants and greenhouse gases at each terminal.
… (Bloomberg news)

Driverless cars may be the popular thing in the news but driverless and electric/battery powered container movement reduces pollution and increases efficiency.
So, how's the partnership with the Longshoreman's Union going?

To take full advantage of the new equipment, TraPac President Frank Pisano needs to help speed containers away from the docks, so he's implementing an appointment system for truckers. They often arrive unannounced and then wait as port employees scout around for their container. This waiting is becoming intolerable for drivers as congestion grows. By 2040, regional container traffic could almost triple to 41.1 million 20-foot equivalent units from 15.3 million last year, according to a recent forecast commissioned by the ports.

As they grapple with this onslaught, the California facilities lag far behind some counterparts in adopting autonomous technology. Since 1993, Rotterdam has used precursors to the self-driving equipment Pisano is installing. Europe's largest facility, it now has five fully automated deep-sea terminals.

At Los Angeles and Long Beach, the International Longshore and Warehouse Union refused to formally accept self-driving and automated technologies until 2008. Since then, none of the ILWU's 14,000 full-time West Coast dock members have lost jobs, but 10,000 contingent workers are called less often, said Jim McKenna, president of the Pacific Maritime Association, an employer group. He declined to say how much less. But it's enough that ILWU leaders are no more enthusiastic about having Jerry Brown promote autonomous driving in the name of clean air today, as they were about having corporations promote containerization in the name of efficiency half a century ago.

"If I have to lose a year or two at the end of my time in this world so I can send my kid to school, I have no problem with that,'' said Mondo Porras, vice president of ILWU Local 13 in San Pedro.

If Brown wants to clean the air by making ports more efficient, Porras said, he should stop Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and other retailers from using them as rent-free storage lots.

Such finger-pointing is inevitable, said Jon Slangerup, chief executive of the Port of Long Beach, because no single entity has door-to-door responsibility for freight that's passing through—like an airport with no air-traffic control system.

With his Sustainable Freight plan, Brown is offering himself as the controller the ports need. And he's trying to harness the increased efficiency of self-driving to encourage everyone—shippers, terminal operators, union workers and truckers—to go along.

"Efficiency and the environment go hand in hand,'' Slangerup said. "They're two sides of the same coin.''

On This Waterfront, Robot Longshoremen Are the New Contenders - John Lipper - Bloomberg News. April 24, 2016 — 9:01 PM PDT Updated on April 25, 2016 — 11:45 AM PDT
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-25/on-this-waterfront-robot-longshoremen-are-the-new-contenders

Expect the same foot dragging from the ILWU in Seattle! and their political enablers. A couple extra years of West Seattle residents breathing in exhaust from idling trucks waiting to load/unload and ships billowing pollution into the air is a perfectly acceptable exchange for the Port's welfare workers.

Tax subsidized jobs are more important to the ILWU than the health and wellbeing of the citizens. How long will the Seattle City Council continue to embrace this historical "tradition"?


An interesting thing about this story is that Bloomberg News wrote and posted the article on April 24th, a week before the arena vote. The Seattle Times didn't repeat it until 10-days later, after the May 2nd arena vote, on May 14th.
The Seattle Times contributions to the story were changing the headline from, On This Waterfront, Robot Longshoremen Are the New Contenders, to, Self-driving robots are the new longshoremen on L.A. waterfront. Also, this quote from the Northwest Seaport Alliance:

In Seattle and Tacoma, port officials are planning a new operations center that includes a goal of clean-energy productivity, but none of the companies working there have plans to introduce automated carriers anytime soon.

"I think the industry is probably moving in that direction, but we have yet to see any of that up here," said Tara Mattina, a spokeswoman for the Northwest Seaport Alliance, which manages the Seattle and Tacoma ports. "At this point it's still done by humans — really highly skilled humans, I would say."
Self-driving robots are the new longshoremen on L.A. waterfront - Seattle Times, 5/14/2016
http://www.seattletimes.com/business/self-driving-robots-are-the-new-longshoremen-on-la-waterfront

Did the story arrive from LA by truck or by ship? Seriously, 10-days? Were the Seattle Times not following west coast port news? Were they not interested in repeating it before the arena vote on 5/2/2016? Do they have something to hide?

I've reached out to the Port of Seattle and the Northwest Seaport Alliance to see if there was a written exchange between them and the Seattle Times.

Have a great day,
Mike Baker
Seattle, Wa

Follow me here: @TweetMrBaker

Friday, May 13, 2016

Port of Seattle coveted Chris Hansen's SoDo arena property

Looks like the Port of Seattle found a great location for an office building where it could consolidate its white collar workers, Chris Hansen's SoDo property.

(I'll do my Geoff Baker imitation here.) This information was obtained by a public records request. Why were they hiding this information from the public?

But seriously, even the realtor working for the Port of Seattle recognized the great non-industrial location, that has great road access for all of those office workers. I'm not sure where they would park.

"Now, further documents not only show that some work on the scoping project, identified as SD-16, was still being paid for in March of this year (there's a $4,600 invoice out of a $45,000 overall scoping project), but a map of SoDo sites under consideration reveal that Hansen's arena site itself was listed as a potential new home for the Port; that's site number six in the document obtained below in a public records request related to the Port's site search."


Port Considered Developing SoDo Office Space on Hansen's Arena Site | Seattle Met
http://www.seattlemet.com/articles/2016/5/12/hansen-arena-site-appeared-on-list-of-potential-new-port-headquarters

Well, what a bunch of tax dependent assholes the Port of Seattle turned out to be.
Word to the city council, they don't give two fucks about you. They will use you as long as you allow it.

Have a great day,
Mike Baker
Seattle, Wa

Follow me here: @TweetMrBaker

Saturday, September 1, 2012

Port commissioners will consider CEO’s side gig Sept. 11 | Politics Northwest | Seattle Times

Seeking an outside is what they should have done as part of their standard process.

The commission is likely to seek a second, outside opinion on whether CEO Tay Yoshitani’s position on the board is a conflict of interest, said Commission Chairwoman Gael Tarleton.

http://blogs.seattletimes.com/politicsnorthwest/2012/08/31/port-commissioners-will-consider-ceos-side-gig-sept-11/

Maybe the Port wasn't in the best position, politically, ethically, and otherwise, to be picking a fight with Sonics fans.
Their problems run pretty deep, are many, are systemic.
They should have looked for a path to compromise months ago, but didn't.
They should have done a lot of things much more important than fighting an arena that has negligable impact to them.

This is not going to end well for the Port.
It's not going to end with just the CEO.

Have a great day,
Mike Baker

Sent from my iPhone
Visit me here:
http://ManyWordsForRain.blogspot.com

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

What is the Port of Seattle thinking? | Sound Economy with Jon Talton | The Seattle Times

The Port has decided that the Port CEO has complied with the Port ethics rules, so says the Port.

Insular in just this case, or is this the nature of the Port overall?
I think that independant observation of this particular instance should have been use, and possibly the entire Port.

If so much depends on the Port and they do not appear to be building their business case for the future on facts, and their internal decisions are judged by their being a law, or not, then maybe it's time the public had an independant advocate evaluate the Port.

What are the port leaders, and specifically Yoshitani, a smart and capable man, thinking? The seaport has just suffered the loss of a major portion of its container business, with the move of the Grand Alliance to Tacoma. In the dispute over the horrid conditions facing drayage truck drivers, a shameful example of the exploitation of "independent contractors," the port came off as insensitive and out of touch. Meanwhile, the Century Agenda, while a fine aspirational document, still lacks specifics about how the seaport will face growing competitive threats. Among them: the wider Panama Canal, Prince Rupert and Tacoma. Amid all this, the port chose a very public battle against the proposed Sonics arena, as if it's an "either/or" choice, rather than working constructively behind the scenes to ensure improved infrastructure and protection of industrial zoning. These challenges wouldn't seem to leave much "on his own time" time for Yoshitani to be moonlighting.

It would be harsh to wonder if Yoshitani sees disarray and dysfunction at his employer and has decided to cash in while he can. But people are wondering just that. It's time for the port to remember, as it parses "conflicts of interest," that it serves the public interest.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/soundeconomywithjontalton/2019017245_what_is_the_port_of_seattle_th.html


Have a great day,
Mike Baker

Sent from my iPhone
Visit me here:
http://ManyWordsForRain.blogspot.com

Friday, August 24, 2012

Port CEO's external job in question, "We are concerned about the precedent this sets..."

Turns out, the extra job taken by Port of Seattle CEO Tay Yoshitani as a Board Member of Expediters International is in question.

Monday, July 23, 2012

The Seattle Times: Port lacks specifics in arena traffic worries

There is no data to show the Port can attract more ships in the next 25 years. In the past 10 years, its container volume has risen and fallen with the economy. Last month, a consortium of shipping companies moved its business to Tacoma, taking 20 percent of the seaport's business.

The Seattle Times: Port lacks specifics in arena traffic worries

They are in the business of freight mobility and yet they fail to regularly study the mobility of their freight. They take more than $100 million dollars a year in tax money every year and yet, they have no understanding of a key resource for their business.

The arena is going to help traffic for freight, know why? The only meaningful study on traffic will be done as part of the SEPA process for the arena. Chris Hansen will mitigate identifiable impacts, not improve, not make everybody happy, but mitigate. How will he know what the impacts are?
(Pay attention here, Port)
There will be a data collection and a study based on actual data.
Traffic will get better, by having Chris Hansen demonstrate how to recognize a key resource, mobility, and make a plan to do something about it.
See, people just forget, Chris Hansen also needs traffic to flow. His business depends in it. He recognizes it, and is planning to do something to help his business, using data.
Follow that example, Port, you certainly are not leading by that example.

Have a great day,
Mike Baker

Sent from my iPhone
Visit me here:

Sunday, July 8, 2012

Give the Port of Seattle a billion dollars and your Hostages (Rails to Trails, and SODO arena) will be freed.

The Port wants about a billion tax dollars to fund the SR 509 project to get containers from the sea port to Kent.
If you think the Port just wants somebody else to pay for a $180 million dollar Lander Street Overpass, you're fooling yourself.
I-5/SR 509 Freight and Congestion Relief - Schedule and Funding
In order to complete the right of way purchases, design and roadway construction, an additional $975 to $995 million of funding is needed (in future expenditure dollars).
Anybody see the addition of an arena (and Rails to Trails) on this map, or the absence of a billion tax dollars, preventing this Port of Seattle 25 Year expansion pipe dream from happening?

(map from WSDOT project page)

The Port and King County revisited this billion dollar gift to the Port on June 18.
County Council, Port Commissioners discuss opportunities to strengthen regional collaboration
Here is a link to the King County Resolution 2012-0227 that commits the county to, in part, fight for state funding for the SR509 project as mentioned in the video from the 6/18/2012 meeting linked here.

The Port does not care about a warehouse in SODO becoming an arena, or a Rails to Trails project, they care about a billion dollar tax payer funded road to Kent. The Port holds somebody else's project hostage in order to force politicians to lobby for more tax money (roads and trails on the east side, the arena on the west side, all to go after a billion dollar road to Kent).
Wake up.

Seattle is a tourist destination for the cruise ships the Port makes money from, and a point where containers are unloaded, but that's the end of it for Seattle. The Port wants a tax payer funded billion dollar road to the Kent distribution center.